i have to disagree wid you, imho you cannot compare those two.
its not that i think bush is a good politician, actually i dont give shit - he s not my president, and its not my business what is happenin inside america
but people hate bush mainly because of two reasons - war in iraq and... the propaganda movie "9/11". i might agree that this war is: "pointless""unfair" etc etc but i dont believe its just that "america needs oil, so we r gonna bomb iraq and steal it from them".. i think that was a right time to kick hussein ass because that whole shit could go further. hopefully it didnt. right now in tv we can watch that iraq citizens are happy that american soldiers are still there to keep peace, because they understand that if they leave al-kaida(or other terrorist groups) may came, and fuckin steal their freedom again (yes i believe they have freedom now)
to be honest i dont care about this oil thingy, maybe that was one of the reasons to attack iraq, maybe it wasnt. even if it was that couldNOT be the only one - but imo thats kinda obvious if u attack smth u wanna have some profit from this. so they take, btw did they?
from the other hand, osama bin laden. i guess u forgot 9/11 and osama's satisfied smiling face when people were dyin in wtc if u place those two at the same "level".
once more i wanna say that i dont care about bush's politics. i also think he is a dumbass etc. my point is that we shouldnt compare politicians (no matter how bad they re) to terrorists who are fuckin killin innocent people [wtc, train-metro stations]
btw, sorry for my english
now i realized